Flagler Hill - Love and Relationships
The new online destination for mature dialogue about Life, Love, & Relationships!
September 9th 2010
Is Dating Someone for Their Potential a Good Idea?
by Dashon on April 22, 2010, 1:26 am in Dating
Share |
40
comments

As an invited member of the media, I attended the taping of ABC’s Nightline segment on the topic of “Why Can’t Successful Black Women Find a Man?”   I was surprised to learn that Hill Harper & Sherri Shepard had a history.

The story goes….that prior to the rise of their respective careers; Hill went into a Taco Bell where he met Sheri.  He put his game down, and asked her to go out with him, but she declined.  Her rationale was that she was marriage-minded at that time, and felt that with them both relying on the bus for transportation, she didn’t think it was wise to get involved with a guy that didn’t own a car.  He used that moment to state that he didn’t have a car, but he had Potential.

The idea of dating someone for their potential is a not a new one, however I have to wonder how many of us really do that?  Or are we looking for someone who is already beautifully wrapped and topped off with the proverbial red bow? 

I think that dating with potential in mind, is more effectual for younger folks who are still figuring out who they are, and laying the groundwork for their future.  When you’re younger, the perception of a person’s potential is a more viable consideration, because most people don’t really come into their own until their late twenties to mid-thirties.  Prior to that time the foundation is still somewhat wet, and pliable. 

Once an individual has reached a certain phase in life, dating based on potential becomes a less plausible option.  The older a person gets the more set in their ways they become, and the more likely it is that what you see -- is exactly what you’re going to get.  Not to say, that people don’t change or experience major growth (be it personal or professional) once they reach a certain age, but the likelihood of that happening [in a significant way] decreases with time.

As a seasoned woman, I’m open to compromising, and stepping out of my comfort zone for my man’s benefit; but I really don’t want to be that gray hair woman that’s working two jobs  because I’m still waiting on my man’s potential to bear some fruit.  I’ve accepted the fact that I may have to change an adult diaper or two, but I draw the line at using the benefits I get via my AARP membership to help make ends meet, while I wait for his potential to take flight. 

As we mature, having a mate that’s also mature, a mate that’s sure of who they are, and that has already somewhat settled in their life, becomes a bigger factor in the dating game than whether or not they have the “potential” to one day be those things.  Hell, I may not even be around to see that potential come to pass.  So with all due respect to Mr. Harper, dating “potential” is for the young folks.

FH: What are your thoughts on the topic?  What does dating potential look like?   Is it a practical dating strategy even after you get to a certain age? 

On April 22, 2010, 9:33 am MassAppeal says:
Dashon

Great blog first off. In response to your question when women reach a certain age they're not interested in dating a man with potential...we need to be doing our thing now. This might be appealing for people in their early 20's just getting started in their careers. Women at a certain age are no longer interested in a 5-10 year plan unless you're already doing your thing and everything else suppliments what we as men have already accomplished. At a certain age women don't want to hear about responsiblities but what you've accomplished and how you plan on continuing your life plan.

Women have been duped or misled by the pipe dreams presented by many men only to stick around long enough with no results. At this day and age you must be doing it today with proof.

The problem lies is that women feel the grass is always greener on the other side. There's always someone with more accomplishments and they feel they deserve the best of the best. I do believe women have good options of men who's out here holding our own, but women always want THAT dude and it's getting harder and harder to meet this ever fluid list of preferences that keeps changing once we meet your criteria. 
On April 22, 2010, 9:46 am Dashon says:
"The problem lies is that women feel the grass is always greener on the other side."

@Mass: 
Do you feel that this same thing can be said about the men?  I've heard it said that part of the reason that guys find it hard to commit is because they fear getting "stuck" with someone and then seeing something better (in their opinion) come along, and not be in a position to find out if it really is.


"There's always someone with more accomplishments and they feel they deserve the best of the best."

Ditto with men?  Only the criteria is someone better looking or with a better body?

"I do believe women have good options of men who's out here holding our own, but women always want THAT dude and it's getting harder and harder to meet this ever fluid list of preferences that keeps changing once we meet your criteria." 

Another part of the segment that was cut was Hill Harper's comment that "You have 95 percent of the single women trying to date 5 percent of the single men."

Your comment would suggest that you agree with his assessment...do you?  If yes, how so?
On April 22, 2010, 9:56 am TMurray says:
@Dashon

I think we all date people for potential.  I think at any age we all have potential.

However, to your point, as we mature and get older I think when we date the prospects should have realized at least some (not saying all) of the potential they have had since birth.

While many people change directions, change careers, etc. I think at age 35 we should all have some success stories, no? And these success stories don't have to be about promotions, money or a job.  But what I am saying is that I believe by then the momentum of life should have, at least for me, taken you to a place where you have some things you are proud of (and of course we'll have things we are not proud of).

I am a nerd so when I hear "potential" I think about science class and potential energy. All objects have potential energy. It is stored. So if I meet someone in my late 20s or early 30s I am going to look at how they are using that potential energy. Do they let it sit? Is it used towards a passion, to help others, etc?

merriam-webster says potential is existing in possibility.....I think in younger years we are more about possibility. As we get older we seek possibility but understand reality a little more clearly.
On April 22, 2010, 10:00 am MassAppeal says:
@Dashon

Men are constantly on the hunt so if we take the time, energy and finances to court you and if we're willing to give you a title then we're satisfied for the most part. If a man avoids giving you a commitment or a title....he doesn't want you. Plain and simple. It's easier for us to back away if we're not seeing what we need out of woman at the beginning stages rather than having to go through a formal dropping or a breakup. We're not afraid to commit, we're just more selective than women think. More men are looking for stability than what women think. But some women mistake a few phone calls or some sex as a form of a commitment.

I do agree with that 95% of women are looking for THAT type of guy. You have women who we may be considered a 5 who may feel they're good on paper thinking now that they've received their Doctorate or law degree all of sudden deserves a Idris type of guy. Not saying it's about looks because you can be a physical dime, credentials and again....won't have the ability to connect with a man on an emotional level. It's like having text book smarts and no street sense whatsoever. Dashon they all don't have that ability like you do which is why you can relate to damn near everybody on this site...very rare.  
On April 22, 2010, 10:14 am Dashon says:
"merriam-webster says potential is existing in possibility.....I think in younger years we are more about possibility. As we get older we seek possibility but understand reality a little more clearly."

@TMurray:
  Agreed and well said!  While we can have "potential" at any age, by a certain point in our lives (as you said) a certain level of responsibility [in our lives] should be evident. 

If I'm 40 years old and have never lived away from home, kept a job longer than 6 months, or never been anywhere outside of my hometown ...then any "potential" (actual or percieved) that I might have would pale in comparison to my reality.  Ya feel me?


"But some women mistake a few phone calls or some sex as a form of a commitment."

@Mass:
  Unfortunately, so do some men.  **Sighs**

Thanks for the compliment.  I agree that we have to broaden our horizons.  Some women attempt to do that, but the mistake they make when they do -- is to try to make him over into THAT guy.  Then when it blows up in their faces, they say...."I tried to date different type of guys and it didn't work."  Seriously? 

On April 22, 2010, 10:18 am Substance says:
@Dashon....great blog (as usual).....

@Mass..... great comment (as usual)......

I agree at a certain age, you don't really have [space] for potential...... but at the same time, we have to be "tactful" is determining -"potential to do what?????" Start ANOTHER business...... or get your first apartment at 30!!!!

I think we look at the "visual" more than the "VISION" of a person..... As soon as we "see" a person without a car, we assume he is uneducated, unemployed (underemployed) and ["UNcatchable"] and we never stop to think/ (or ask).... maybe THERE IS A METHOD BEHIND THIS MADNESS!!!!

Maybe he has figured getting rid of his $500 BMW payment will help him get closer to the money necessary for starting a new restaurant, his/her own publishing company or the next big "Idea"....... since he lives with 2 miles of his job and on the bus line anyway!!!!

Of course, some situations don't warrant any kind of "investigation"...... However, do your homework when necessary.... you may miss out on the next Hil Harper!!!!!!!!!
On April 22, 2010, 10:24 am wotubenmissn says:
Hmm Dashon, I like where you went with this topic, I was expecting a little something different, so I've gotta give you my "I'm feelin' some kinda way" take.

Your premise seems to assume that the "potential" is measured by how much money the man is bringing in.

This goes against the point that a man cares more about how his woman makes him feel, as opposed to how much money she's making.  You then add that you don't want to have to work 2 jobs....  If you were in a situation like that, it would come from your decision to live a certain lifestyle.  Let me take that back, it would come from both of you deciding this is the type of lifestyle I want to have.

So if you happen to make more money for whatever reason (education, willing to work 2 jobs) then you would approach that situation knowing full well that if I want to continue this, it is my choice.

The potential I would think would focus more on how that man treats you...does he have the potential to learn what it takes to please you?  If he appears to be stuck in his ways of being self centered, his potential may be low.  If you see him offering of himself, no matter how big or small the gesture is, he is offering of himself.  It would become your duty (if you cared enough about the situation) to figure out whether those gestures are enough to satisfy you.

The potential is whether the dude can love you for who you are, and vice versa.
On April 22, 2010, 10:37 am Dashon says:
@Substance:  Thanks!  I like "Look more at the visual than the vision" -- great quote!

I think some do tend to look at the wrapping and make a decision about the quality of the gift inside without really opening the package; but like you said...some stuff requires no investigation. 

I'm cool with supporting a man's dreams, and supporting his decision to modify his lifestyle in order to be fiscally responsible, but I'm beyond the point of "starting a life together" -- from ground zero.  I'm moving toward my retirement years, so a man who has demonstrated a certain level of responsibility in his life is more important to me than what he "potentially" can do in the future. 

I'm still growing, and I have the "potential" to be a great writer which is what I've decided to pursue as my next career, however I have demonstrated in my life that I am a responsible adult, I have some stability, and have made plans for my future (e.g., investments, etc.) so that when the day comes that I can no longer drop it like its hot, or hustle like I do now...I won't have to worry about being a homeless old lady depending on the state for support.   So my paradigm on potential is a bit different now than what it was when I was younger.
On April 22, 2010, 10:53 am Dashon says:
Your premise seems to assume that the "potential" is measured by how much money the man is bringing in.

@Wo: 
Not at all!  You know what they say about "assuming"...LOL!

I measure potential on a broader scale, but the bottom-line for me if I am to evaluate potential is:  Does he have the potential to be a good mate for ME?  Finances are not the end all be all of that criteria.  Do I desire a mate who can contribute to the support of our lifestyle and well being?  Absolutely!  Does that alone determine for me that he has the potential to be my man...Nope!

You then add that you don't want to have to work 2 jobs....  If you were in a situation like that, it would come from your decision to live a certain lifestyle.  Let me take that back, it would come from both of you deciding this is the type of lifestyle I want to have.

As the eldest sibling and grandchild on my Mom's side, I had the responsibility of taking care of both parents & my grandmother through their respective illnesses, and utlimately burying them.  These experiences taught me how important it is to plan for this phase of our lives.  When we're younger we don't necessarily think about how much it will take to live comfortably (not Extravagantly), and the costs associated with taking care of ourselves as we age. The seniors I know that are still working every day vs. enjoying a retirement is in large part due to lack of planning for this stage of life.  I don't want to be that person, and if I have a partner who is not responsible in that way....then it may be necessary for me to take on more work in order to avoid being a financial burden on my son -- who ultimately will the one to shoulder some of the responsibility of helping me at that time in my life. 
On April 22, 2010, 10:58 am Dashon says:
The potential is whether the dude can love you for who you are, and vice versa.

@Wo:
  Agreed!  Again you assumed that my reference to potential was strictly  financially based (and perhaps my comment about the two jobs inferred that)....but, you didn't ask me -- you told me. 

I'm not Sherri Shepard...my criteria is based on my needs, and I need a man to love me in a way that's healthy and makes me want to be a better woman, and yes, to be a fiscally responsible partner, not someone without a track record of any kind (with respect to responsibility), because at 48 the near future has a different impact for me.   Ya feel me?
On April 22, 2010, 11:02 am Dashon says:
Meant to say:  Because at 48 the near future has a different impact for me than it did when I ws 28 or even 38 for that matter.  
On April 22, 2010, 11:04 am wotubenmissn says:
ok, ok, ok Dashon!  You've explained your position.  Even though my statement was "it seems to assume" and why it seemed that way, was because of the example you posted.  Since the whole issue of finances is a hot button for a lot of folks, maybe you can take that as a Devil's Advocate statement by me.  Someone who hasn't read all of your posts may come here, log in, interpret it in the same way I did, and walk off frustrated.  Just sayin'.

On April 22, 2010, 11:10 am Dashon says:
@Wo:  I get it, I figured the 2 job thing is what launched your remarks.  Didn't mean to over-communicate my point, just giving you (and others who will read the blog) some context for my paradigm.
On April 22, 2010, 12:11 pm Nocturnal says:
Potential is important. You know what is possible or likely. However, potential is not enough, the person should be using their potential in tangible ways. I think the H. Harper/S. Shepherd story is a good example of how many women who think they're marriage-minded (regardless of age) don't even know what they want and don't have a good eye for potential. The reason being is too many times they just skim along the surface and never delve too deep or they make snap judgements based only on the superficial/shallow. Moreover, it's hypocritical to say you won't date someone who doesn't have a car and you don't have a car yourself! Plus, isn't she happily divorced, now? I bet if she knew then what she knows now (or at least gave a brotha a proper hearing)she would've jumped at the opportunity...or if she had to choose between her ex-husband and H. Harper...who do you think she would choose?
On April 22, 2010, 12:23 pm Substance says:
You are right Noc......
On April 22, 2010, 12:23 pm Nocturnal says:
On second thought...that was not fair. We're talking about S. Shepherd, after all. Considering the things that have come out of that woman's mouth now (like not that long ago) I can only imagine how utterly ridiculous & foolish she was then! LMAO...yeah, H. Harper definately dodged a major bullet on that one. Like Dashon says....just my 2.5
On April 22, 2010, 12:30 pm Dashon says:
@Noc:  

" However, potential is not enough, the person should be using their potential in tangible ways"

Agreed!

LOL @ your comments about Sherri.  I think she does regret it.  She was giving Hill those "I could sop you up with a biscut" looks all night, and even after he shared that story she said something to the effect of, well I'm successful now -- we can do something!  Hill gave her a look like "Yeah Right!".
On April 22, 2010, 12:49 pm MassAppeal says:
@Substance

"I think we look at the "visual" more than the "VISION" of a person..... As soon as we "see" a person without a car, we assume he is uneducated, unemployed (underemployed) and ["UNcatchable"] and we never stop to think/ (or ask).... "

Very profound comment.
On April 22, 2010, 12:54 pm Substance says:
@Mass... Thanks

@Dashon and No.... Comment on Sherri.... That is toooo funny
WOW, still "foolish, huh"!!!
On April 22, 2010, 1:10 pm Nocturnal says:
Well, she did say she's still not sure if the earth is round or flat...I'm just saying...what is this? 1492?!?
On April 22, 2010, 4:00 pm SoulonArt says:
I believe we all have areas of improvement and are a work in progress, but we are in different stages of that progress. We need to be realistic as to where we are in our lives and how long we're willing to wait for the person to meet his/her potential. For example, in our early 20s we may meet a grad student or an aspiring entrepreneur and believe they are destined for greatness, so we decide to stick with them and support their journey because you may have a little more time to play with. Then there's the late bloomer scenario, where we are in our late 30s and meet a 35yr grad student or aspiring entrepreneur who we believe has potential for greatness, but are at a point in our lives where we can't afford to wait 10 years for that greatness to materialize. There is nothing wrong with being honest with what we want and what we are willing to sacrifice for it.
On April 22, 2010, 4:04 pm SoulonArt says:
And just to clarify, I don't consider someone with good ideas or pretty smart, but won't work or is unmotivated, to be someone with potential worth investing into. I consider someone who may not be where they want to be yet, but is striving for it passionately, to be someone with potential. We all have some level of potential, but some are destined to be tragic stories.
On April 22, 2010, 7:10 pm sunnyislands says:
"As we mature, having a mate that’s also mature, a mate that’s sure of who they are, and that has already somewhat settled in their life, becomes a bigger factor in the dating game than whether or not they have the “potential” to one day be those things.  Hell, I may not even be around to see that potential come to pass.  So with all due respect to Mr. Harper, dating “potential” is for the young folks."

I utterly and completely agree with this statement.   I am way past the age of looking for potential in my mate.  Instead, I am all about how you handle what you have, what you have become, and where you are going with what you have. 
On April 22, 2010, 8:23 pm IntroSpectiv says:
I don't see the problem with potential. But I seem to be alone in my line of thought....Seems like I have to be perfect in order to have a chance sometimes.

As far as Sherri Shepard goes....Serves her right that she caught the vapors.

As a guy that has been in Hill Harper's position (substitute KFC and Krystal in place of Taco Bell and add in the fact that I am not an author) ..... Big fist pump in the air.....lol

Funny how it often works out that way.
On April 22, 2010, 8:52 pm Dashon says:
I don't see the problem with potential. But I seem to be alone in my line of thought....Seems like I have to be perfect in order to have a chance sometimes.

@Intro:
  There is no problem with potential but as others have said...potential is relative to what a person is doing to affirm that potential and where on the "potential ladder" they are in relation to that person's life and where they are.  Did that make sense?

Okay Lil Bruh -- I got love for you, what with you being my lil homie and all, but its time for a does of tough love...

You don't have to be perfect, but you do need to get rid of that funky attitude.  I've said it before and I'll say it for the last time....you are your own worst enemy when it comes to women. 

It might have been some women on this site that would have been checking for a young brother like yourself, but that negative attitude is a MAJOR turnoff.  You will continue to get what you have gotten (which don't include no azz) if you don't check it. 

You got some things going on for yourself (intelligent, a career path, a sense of humor -- cryptic as it is -- lol)...but nobody can get next to that because its covered with this big azz gray cloud of gloom & doom.  Not sure what it'll take for you to flip it....but I have a feeling that until you do...nothing is gonna change for you ...ya feel me?
On April 22, 2010, 9:39 pm IntroSpectiv says:
@ Dashon

I understand you. Loud and clear.

I's ironic that the thing I'm looking for is also a major component of what I need to change in order to get it.

I think one or two positive experiences, no matter how minor, will at least get the ball rolling. Get the swag up, as the young folks would say. Success builds confidence.

On April 23, 2010, 12:03 am Dashon says:
@Intro:  Good luck to you on doing that internal work.  I know you can do it dude....hell, you're a native Detroiter....and you know how we roll!  Much love...
On April 23, 2010, 6:11 am femmeamoured says:
I would say yes.  Yes because you can nuture the potential.  Yes especially if that person is grooming their potential.  I can come up with many reasons to say yes. 
On April 23, 2010, 11:25 am BEASTFRMVA says:
I have/am dating for potential as I feel that I am the bread winner and need no one to help me in any financial facet. But I do agree that this is not an easy task for all.
On April 23, 2010, 1:17 pm MsValleyG says:
I think dating for potential may indeed have an age limit as many have indicated before. In our 20s & even early 30s seeking potential is fine but as many get older, are set in their ways, have their own stuff & are doing find by themselves, I think seeking potential goes out the window. After many reach a certain age, they pretty much know what they're looking for. I agree w/Wo, we are all a work in progress & evolving daily. However, what would a grown woman be doing with a man whose 40 still living in his parents home & can't hold a job but is talking about starting a business??? That seems counter productive to me.

I feel I'm still at the age where I can see potential in someone & work with them & stick by them as they reach that potential as long as they're progressive and working towards some goals. However, don't expect me to sit around waiting for a man to bloom LOL!

For instance, I have a 33 yr old male friend who still lives at home, his car is shot & he was laid off last Jan & still hasn't found a job. I saw a lot of potential in him. However, after awhile I noticed he was not very motivated & not working towards his own progression. So I opted out and guess what he's still in the same predicament today. I said that to say that though some people may have potential, it means nothing if they're not actually working towards enhancing their own lives...
On April 23, 2010, 1:20 pm MsValleyG says:
@Substance: NICE! "I think we look at the "visual" more than the "VISION" of a person..... Many are looking with their physical eye but fail to use their 'minds' eye to see the very core of a person. So TRUE!
On April 25, 2010, 12:43 pm Dashon says:
Its ironic that I wrote this blog last week, and then in the same week meet a dude who wants me to give him a chance based on his potential.

I like dude's mental game, but as I explained to him, only time will tell if his walk reflects his talk, especially given that most of what he has to offer a woman right now (IMHO) is based on potential. 

So while I feel a bit of attraction to him mentally, I'm not about to jump in the water on this one.  I have no problem with being his platonic friend, but to puruse anything other than that (at this time) is not an option for me.  I believe I've passed the point of utilizing potential (without evidence of actions or results) as a dating criteria.  Just my 2.5
On April 25, 2010, 1:02 pm MassAppeal says:
@Dashon

What is this potential based on... busness ventures, personal growth.anything specific to help you measure if his walk reflects his talk?
On April 25, 2010, 10:49 pm Dashon says:
@Mass:  To give you some context...he's 11 years younger than me.  Not really an issue seeing that the majority of the guys that step to me are younger (wondering why that is -- but I digress), anyway he has an adult daughter and does not want more kids...so what would normally be a deal breaker for me (wanting to have kids) is not an issue in this case. 

He's just relocated here less than 2 weeks ago from Chicago.  He is in job search mode, and currently living with family.  I understand being in transition, and I really do wish him well.  Being an HR person, I can assist with the job search and don't mind doing that....I would do that for anyone in the job market. 

However, because he just got here, and is pretty much starting over, there's nothing to base how his potential "talk" stacks up to his walk, except his past, which from how he describes it has been an up & down thing due to economics & personal stuff.   Ya feel me?
On April 26, 2010, 6:41 am MassAppeal says:
@Dashon

I definitely see what you're saying. I would figure dude needs to get situated and back on his feet so he can get adjusted to the city before he really starts dating.

I'm suprised you wonder why younger men step to you. You're such a vibrant, upbeat insightful women. Men of all ages are attracted to those qualities. Keep doing wht you're doing.
On April 26, 2010, 9:00 am Perpetual says:
"Once an individual has reached a certain phase in life, dating based on potential becomes a less plausible option"

I agree. It depends on what area of his life he is lacking in. I would totally date a man with the potential to accomplish many things (at this time). However, my expectancy level will change with age

On April 26, 2010, 9:04 am loveless says:
POTENTIAL IS GOOD FOR SOMEONE IN THEIR TWENTIES-  I WANT SOMEONE ESTABLISHED- I DOT HAVE TIME TO WAIT FOR A FORTY YEAR OLD TO HAVE POTENTIAL- HIS POTENTIALS SHOULD HAVE MATERALIED BY NOW-
On April 29, 2010, 8:12 pm msbnmd says:
@Dash: I'm just getting in on this convo but glad that I didn't miss it!!! So many things that stimulated my thinking as I read the blog and the comments!

I really like the part in your blog where you say that dating a person for "potential" is a relative choice because more has to be considered than what they can do...I am interested in what they have done. This means a lot to me as a young professional not because of its financial rewards [because just cuz a dude got it doesn't mean I'm going to get his] but it has more to do with the experience of success. Potential is a good thing, like most people have said, when a person is still developing, but even then, I think each person should experience a sense of success whether they've reached their desired goal or not.

Like Intro said...success builds confidence, and I would add to that: character, strength, faith, and stamina against adversity. If a man or woman regardless of their age hasn't had a good dose of success it can have major affects on their spirit and self-esteem. Which leads me to my next point - has any of us ever met a person who habitually failed at something, whether they had potential or not, and seen them remain happy, at peace, and with confidence? I haven't. And this is where dating a person's potential gets sticky for me: the things that are needed in order to develop a strong relationship between two people are: endurance, courage, confidence, faith, respect, self-esteem, etc. People who have a world of potential but who have not materialized that potential usually lack the aforementioned. Thus, for me, they don't make good partners.

On April 29, 2010, 8:29 pm msbnmd says:
I dated a man for four years because he had "great potential". He was not only brilliant, but 12 years my senior. I was 24, and he as 36. I thought that those before me had failed to "see" that he was both smart and capable of finishing Dental School. After the first year, I watched him slowly progress and I celebrated each gain with him. When the second year arrived and I was finishing my first degree and he was 38 an opportunity that he had been "waiting for" came along and we were both thrilled! While I was in Grad school and he was in a Dental program we moved in together to help one another through school. About two months before I was to finish my Master's program he was kicked out of the program he was in for virtually the same reasons why he hadn't completed school the first time! 

I was devasted, hurt, let down, and worried. At that point I could see how continuining a relationship with him [a man I deeply loved] was going to be a constant experience of let downs. Not to mention the toll these failures took on his general disposition. He was moody, distant, and often accused me of "not understanding" him because I was finishing school and he had not. It was deeply difficult but I had to leave him ~ in addition to not being able to produce from his potential he had alienated me beyond repair. It was extremely difficult for me. I was sad to see him fail; but more afraid of the weight his continued failures would have on me as a person. 

As you can see, I am deeply pessimistic about women dating a man for his potential. Having tried it and not seen it work, and had to heal the damage it can cause. Sure, there are men who make good on the visions they create for themselves but I think women should be extremely discerning about what constitutes potential and what is a whole bunch of hot air. In the end, I believed in him more than he bleieved in himself.
On April 30, 2010, 7:12 am Dashon says:
@MsB:  Given your experience, I can certainly understand why "dating potential" is not something that would appeal to you.  I'm kind of the same way.  At my age, its important to me that a man has accomplished some things...like the basics.  (e.g., a demonstrated ability to provide for himself, and a certain level of mental maturity)

It's not about him not being able to grow in some areas of his life, but his willingness to put actions to a growth plan, and evidence via his actions of that willingness.

The potential (as you said) does not have to be material or financial in nature; its more about his character and maturity as a man. 
Leave your Comment
You must be a member to comment. Please Login or Register.


Advertisements
copyright © 2010 Flagler Hill llc. all rights reserved.
FlaglerHill.com is a registered trademark of Flagler Hill llc. unauthorized duplication of any content is a violation of applicable laws.
FlaglerHill.com is a social media website focused on African American love and relationships. Black singles and married couples visit our online blogging community daily to discuss a variety of topics including divorce, marriage, infidelity and entertainment. FlaglerHill.com offers free advice and dating tips through advice columns offered by the Hill Writers. Become a member of FlaglerHill.com and interact with our community to gain insight into the romantic lives of black men and women through blogs and discussions. At FlaglerHill.com we will discuss elements of success and failure when it comes to love and relationships, the impact of separation on the black family, raising children, unfaithful mates and spouces, divorce and counseling.